Solutions / Clinical Validation & Industry
Strategic programFrom promising idea to credible clinical evidence.
A governed pathway for hospital-based validation, academia–industry collaboration and transition into clinical trials.
Strategic program. The modules on this page are planned or in development and are not yet generally available. Talk to us about timing and pilots.
The problem
What goes wrong today.
Promising academic work and new technologies often lack a clear path to hospital-based validation. Industry struggles to find the right investigators and sites, and institutions struggle to collaborate without losing oversight.
Who it is for
- Innovators and academic teams
- Pharma, MedTech and CROs
- Hospitals and investigators
- Research Offices
What MRB does
What MRB is designed to do.
MRB is being developed to help teams define the evidence question, find suitable sites and investigators, run validation studies through the proper ethics pathway, and move into My Trial Board (MTB) when a project becomes a formal clinical trial.
Validation pathwayIllustrative1Evidence question definedDone
2Protocol draftedDone
3Site and investigator matchIn progress
4Ethics submissionNext
Illustrative interface, not a product screenshot.
Key capabilities
Modules in Clinical Validation & Industry.
Strategic programClinical Validation Services
Hospital-linked clinical evidence for technologies, products and interventions.
- Clinical question and evidence-gap definition
- Hospital, site and investigator matching
- Validation-study design support
- Evidence report and next-step recommendation
Strategic programIndustry Collaboration
Connect the right research question with the right expertise.
- Research-interest and expertise profiles
- Collaboration opportunity posting
- Investigator-initiated study pathways
- Controlled communication and document exchange
Strategic programMy Trial Board (MTB) Integration
When research becomes a clinical trial, move into MTB without starting from zero.
- Hand-off from MRB project to MTB trial record
- Re-use of investigator and institution information
- Protocol and ethics continuity where applicable
Typical workflow
How a project moves through it.
- Define the evidence question
- Design the protocol
- Match site and investigator
- Ethics pathway
- Run the study
- Evidence report
Outputs
What you end up with.
- A defined evidence question and study design
- Matched sites and investigators
- A clinical evidence report
- A continuous research-to-trial pathway
Institutional value
What the institution gains.
- Structured academia–industry collaboration
- Institutional oversight retained throughout
- Sponsored research opportunities for investigators
- A route from validation into formal trials
Related solutions
Where the record goes next.
- Expanding
Grants & Innovation
Match projects to funding, run structured grant calls, and route promising ideas toward IP, incubation and partners.
Grant Assist & Funding Directory · Funder & Grant-Program Management · Innovation Hub, IP & Marketplace
Explore Grants & Innovation - Future program
Evidence & RWE
A future evidence layer for registries, real-world evidence, implementation research and public-health intelligence.
Registries & Real-World Evidence · Public Health & Implementation Research · Preventive Health & Population Intelligence
Explore Evidence & RWE